Janna LynnENC 1102 Syllabus Spring 2005-02___Florida International University Class: ENC 1102 January 09-April 29, 2006 Ref 18987 4J MW 2-3:15 PM; Ref 18997 4M MW 3:30-4:45 PM Instructor: PROFESSOR LYNN lynnj@fiu.edu Office Hours: By Appointment 1:00-2 PM MW
Essay Assignments: To receive a passing grade in English 1102 requires writing in-class and out-of-class essays at an acceptable college level (grade C, 75 or higher) and participating in group assignments related to the written essays compiled in a portfolio and presented for oral and written group presentations. · Out-of-class essays must be typed and double-spaced using the spell/grammar check so that essays are free of mechanical spelling and grammatical errors in MLA format. · In-class essays must be written legibly in ink on one side of the page in large enough print that your instructor can easily read. Late- or Missed Work Penalty. Completion of In- and Out-of-Class Assignments on the due date is mandatory. • Late out-of-class assignments will receive a one-letter grade drop. Late essays are accepted one week from the due date only with instructor approval. No make-up is accepted for missed in-class work. • Your final evaluation is based on completion of all assigned coursework. Expository essays will be averaged as one grade; failure to submit any of the major essay assignments will result in a full grade drop (10 points) in the final essay grade average. Attendance Absences without penalty: 2-day a week classes—3 absences Holidays: M January 16 Martin Luther King • Each absence thereafter will result in a one-point deduction from your final grade.. Accumulating double the allowed absences will result in a failing grade. Repeated tardiness to class will be counted as an absence (3 late classes = 1 absence) • Perfect attendance and class participation that promotes the group learning process count as extra credit; conversely, unacceptable academic conduct counts against the overall grade.
All out-of-class essays will be submitted to Turnitin.com to identify unoriginal documentation from their database of published works. Students will have a 48-hour window to revise incorrectly documented text and sources in research-based essays*. Draft and final essays are due in both hard copy and electronic versions to turnitin.com on the corresponding dates on the syllabus. Essays that are not submitted to turnitin.com on the due date will not be evaluated and will receive a grade of 0.
Course Objectives: In English 1101 and 1102 students write essays that address the chosen topic by supporting a central idea with evidence and targeting a specific audience. Students write in several rhetorical genres (including expository, argumentative, reflective, and narrative writing) and learn to adapt conventions of structure and style appropriately for the genre. Reading selections enable students to gain practice in critical, analytically active reading, and show evidence of the ability to respond critically to written texts, including those of their peers by engaging in a full writing process (invention, drafting, revising, and editing). Students analyze literary texts, focusing on rhetorical strategy and understanding how the writer responded to his/her historical/cultural context. Students learn to write research essays that exhibit information literacy by effectively incorporating sources that synthesize the ideas of others to support the essay’s central idea as well as learn scholarly research to access information and to formulate criteria for evaluating sources and to properly document sources.
Note: All writingis evaluated on both style and content. Error-free writing has little effect if it does not contain sufficient detail and if the writer does not use clear and effective language. Similarly, a paper that is well developed and expressive can fail if it is marred by mechanical, stylistic, and structural weaknesses. A paper that contains a grade of 89/90, 79/80, or 69/70 means that the essay contains the strengths of the higher grade but is too flawed in one of the areas required to warrant the higher grade. However, the overall improvement of essays written throughout the semester and other factors such as constructive classroom participation and understanding of course content may result in the higher grade as a determining factor in the final grade average for the student.
Plagiarism. Intentional plagiarism occurs when someone submits work written by someone else, or submits work, part or all of which is taken from a printed or Internet source, with no documentation of the source. An essay that does not attribute the use of external sources is an automatic failure. Unintentional plagiarism may occur when students are not sure of when or how to acknowledge sources. The rule is that if you include any information from an outside source in your essay either indirectly or directly, whether you paraphrase, summarize, or directly quote the information, it must be acknowledged as a parenthetic reference in the text and included with a list of Works Cited at the end of the paper. The most serious consequence of plagiarism at the college level may be failure and expulsion. Documentation. In English and in some humanities classes, you will be asked to use the Modern Language Association system for documenting sources, using in-text citations that refer readers to a list of Works Cited at the end of the paper (MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers, 6th ed., 2003). Research-based essays will be submitted to Turnitin.com to identify unoriginal documentation from their database of published works. Only scholarly, critical reviews will be accepted as external sources. Sources that cite summaries of literary works will be rejected, and the use of such summaries without documentation in place of the student’s original ideas constitutes plagiarism.
Definition of Academic Trust
Academic trust is the assurance that teacher and student will faithfully abide by the rules of intellectual engagement established between them. This trust can exist only when students adhere to the standards of academic honesty and when faculty test and evaluate students in a manner that presumes that students are acting with academic integrity. (Committee on Academic Honesty, Proposal for an Academic Honor code)
2005-02 Professor Lynn 2005-02 Professor Lynn
|
|